Week Eight : Further Research Interactive Architecture

Following the question posed on my last entry a reading from Interactive Architecture considered just that; the emergence of active participation and communication with built environments. According to Fox & Kemp (2009), "adaptive control of an interactive space allows for enhancing and simplifying of daily tasks and creates a sense of active participation with the environment". In terms of community collaboration not only would an interactive environment foster greater emotional attachment to an architectural entity but the ability for spatial adjustments in real time allow for new connections to be fostered between citizens.

The following clip from Microsoft considers the potential of living within a highly interactive environment. In terms of application for Paddington it would not only influence the spatial needs of different services but it also creates the opportunity for people to both exist in the space without being physically present and communicate in much more subtle and passive ways. 

Real time information exchange represents immense opportunity for in the establishment of my entity; a way of bringing to life the humble community notice board if you will. I would suggest though that it is still important for users to have the ability to not only communicate but also manipulate a system to define their activities and desires in order to foster a sense of community ownership and empowerment.