Interestingly, I find it hard to imagine myself in the
future, mainly because there are so very many different avenues that the world
may take. Technology has perhaps the most pressing influence yet I also think
that in some applications it is a step away from the humanity of physical
environments. Thus, I feel quite an aversion to artificial realities (especially
those which have in the past be used to portray the future) as they seem completely
void of human nature. I think regardless of future advances people will always
seek authentic senses and emotion because they are the human variables that make
life what it is. I would envision then that society perhaps fall out of love
with virtual realms and rather seek out ways in which to enhance shared
experiences, knowledge and collaboration. Thus the built environment would become
a platform for abundance, social interaction and adaptation.
Monday 30 July 2012
Week One : Thoughts on Designing the Future
Design of the ever new, as to quote Sadler (2005) is an
imposing challenge. From how I have come to approach the built environment I do
think as architects we immerse ourselves so much in the here and now we rarely adequately
address the life of our design years into the future. In saying that though I
do think it's also pointless to stake the claim that what we design is with any
certainty what future generations will need. To agree with the suggestions made
by Sadler (2005), I think it is crucial for architecture to be capable of
recomposition. Buildings need a capacity for change and while it's a reality perhaps
unfavoured by some professionals (the prospect of the non-designer becoming the
designer) if space cannot be configured by a user which is ever-changing then
does it have a place in an ever-changing world?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)